首页> 外文OA文献 >Does the recruitment of offline households increase the sample representativeness of probability-based online panels? Evidence from the German internet panel
【2h】

Does the recruitment of offline households increase the sample representativeness of probability-based online panels? Evidence from the German internet panel

机译:招聘线下家庭是否增加了基于概率的在线小组的样本代表性?来自德国互联网小组的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The past decade has seen a rise in the use of online panels for conducting survey research. However, the popularity of online panels, largely driven by relatively low implementation costs and high rates of Internet penetration, has been met with criticisms regarding their ability to accurately represent their intended target populations. This criticism largely stems from the fact that (1) non-Internet (or offline) households, despite their relatively small size, constitute a highly selective group unaccounted for in Internet panels, and (2) the preeminent use of nonprobability-based recruitment methods likely contributes a self-selection bias that further compromises the representativeness of online panels. In response to these criticisms, some online panel studies have taken steps to recruit probability-based samples of individuals and providing them with the means to participate online. Using data from one such study, the German Internet Panel, this article investigates the impact of including offline households in the sample on the representativeness of the panel. Consistent with studies in other countries, we find that the exclusion of offline households produces significant coverage biases in online panel surveys, and the inclusion of these households in the sample improves the representativeness of the survey despite their lower propensity to respond.
机译:在过去的十年中,使用在线面板进行调查研究的人数有所增加。但是,在线小组的受欢迎程度很大程度上是由相对较低的实施成本和较高的Internet渗透率所驱动的,但对于它们能否准确代表其预期目标人群的能力提出了批评。这种批评主要源于以下事实:(1)非互联网(或离线)家庭尽管规模相对较小,但却构成了互联网专家小组中无法解决的高度选择性的群体,并且(2)大量使用了基于非概率的招聘方法可能会导致自我选择偏见,从而进一步损害在线面板的代表性。针对这些批评,一些在线小组研究已采取步骤,以基于概率的个人样本为对象,并为他们提供了在线参与的手段。本文使用来自德国互联网专家组这样一项研究的数据,调查了将脱机家庭纳入样本对专家组代表性的影响。与其他国家的研究一致,我们发现,将离线家庭排除在外的在线面板调查中会导致明显的覆盖偏差,并且将这些家庭包括在样本中可提高调查的代表性,尽管他们的答复倾向较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号